From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste•net>
Cc: Dmitry Vilkov <dmitry.a.vilkov@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: don't fall back to Basic auth if we haven't tried Negotiate
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:52:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq60y2dduw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160205210623.GC7403@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Fri, 5 Feb 2016 21:06:24 +0000")
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste•net> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 01:02:58PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Hmph, so documenting that <emptyname>:<emptypassword>@<repository>
>> as a supported way might be an ugly-looking solution to the original
>> problem. A less ugly-looking solution might be a boolean that can
>> be set per URL (we already have urlmatch-config infrastructure to
>> help us do so) to tell us to pass the empty credential to lubCurl,
>> bypassing the step to ask the user for password that we do not use.
>>
>> The end-result of either of these solution would strictly be better
>> than the patch we discussed in that the end user will not have to
>> interact with the prompt at all, right?
>
> Yes, that's true. I'll try to come up with a patch this weekend that
> implements that (maybe remote.forceAuth = true or somesuch).
Thanks.
I think the configuration should live inside http.* namespace, as
there are already things like http[.<url>].sslCert and friends.
I do not have a good suggestion on the name of the leaf-level
variable. ForceAuth sounds as if you are forcing authentication
even when the other side does not require it, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-05 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 9:11 [PATCH] remote-curl: don't fall back to Basic auth if we haven't tried Negotiate Dmitry Vilkov
2016-02-02 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-02 23:29 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-05 9:18 ` Dmitry Vilkov
2016-02-05 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-05 20:58 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-06 17:53 ` Daniel Stenberg
2016-02-05 20:46 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-05 21:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-05 21:06 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-05 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-02-08 9:11 ` Dmitry Vilkov
2016-02-15 18:44 ` [PATCH] http: add option to try authentication without username brian m. carlson
2016-02-15 20:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-02-15 20:29 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-15 20:34 ` Jeff King
2016-02-15 20:36 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-15 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-15 21:41 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-15 21:46 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-02-15 21:51 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-20 14:35 ` [PATCH] remote-curl: don't fall back to Basic auth if we haven't tried Negotiate Dmitry Vilkov
2016-02-20 15:23 ` brian m. carlson
2016-02-20 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-25 16:54 ` Dmitry Vilkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq60y2dduw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=dmitry.a.vilkov@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox