public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why not git reset --hard <path>?
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:42:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq612ucm3p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150928203449.29024.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (George Spelvin's message of "28 Sep 2015 16:34:49 -0400")

"George Spelvin" <linux@horizon•com> writes:

> I was applying an old forgotten stash to see if there were any edits in
> it I wanted to preserve, and my old changes to one file made no sense
> any more.  I wanted to drop then all and keep the version in HEAD.
>
> I'd been using git reset <path> after resolving conflicts, to leave
> the changes in the same un-staged state they were before the stash,
> so I tried using "git reset --hard crypto/842.c" to throw away
> my local changes.
>
> And I got
> fatal: Cannot do hard reset with paths.
>
> So I did "git reset <path>" followed by "git checkout <path>", which
> achieved what I wanted.
>
> But what I don't understand is why git reset couldn't do it for me in one
> step.
>
> I understand that "git reset --soft" makes no sense with a path, but
> why not --hard?

I do not think there is anything fundamentally wrong for wishing for
"reset --hard <pathspec>".  It probably is just that nobody needed
it, because "git checkout HEAD <pathspec>" is a 99% acceptable
substitute for it (the only case where it makes a difference is when
you added a path to the index that did not exist in HEAD).

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-28 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 20:34 Why not git reset --hard <path>? George Spelvin
2015-09-28 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-09-28 20:53   ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-28 21:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-28 21:36       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-09-29  7:06       ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-29 16:15       ` George Spelvin
2015-09-29 19:40     ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-28 22:36   ` George Spelvin
2015-09-28 22:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-28 23:52       ` George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq612ucm3p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox