Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix detection of uname failure

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:09:13 -0700

Charles Bailey <[email-masked]> writes:

> ... I think '< 0' is
> probably better. In POSIX, we shouldn't ever get a negative value which
> isn't -1, but if we ever do it is probably safer to fail. I'll send and
> update.

Thanks; I was about to type the same reasoning and conclusion ;-)