Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pretty: add %D format specifier

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:56:46 -0700

Because patch 1/2 alone does not make much sense without 2/2, it
probably would have been better to do these as a single patch.

And of course a few additional tests to t4205 would not hurt ;-)

Thanks.