Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/gc: protect against sysctl() failure in total_ram

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:59:39 -0700

Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <[email-masked]> writes:

> yes it does, but the "implicit" sign conversion will trigger a warning

Ahh, OK.  That makes sense.  Compilers tend to go quiet when we tell
them we do mean what we are doing.  Thanks.