Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clean: improve -n and -f implementation and documentation

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 10:41:58 -0800

Sergey Organov <[email-masked]> writes:

> I wonder do you mean:
> 
> 	/* Dry run won't remove anything, so requiring force makes no
> 	* sense. Interactive has its own means of protection, so don't
> 	* require force as well */
> 	if (dry_run || interactive)
> 		require_force = 0;
>
> 	if (require_force != 0 && !force)
>                 die_();
> ...

That is explained in a few messages after this one, so I'll wait
until you read them all before responding ;-).

Thanks.