Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] bitmap-format.txt: feed the file to asciidoc to generate html

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 11:39:08 -0700

"Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget" <[email-masked]>
writes:

> From: Abhradeep Chakraborty <[email-masked]>
>
> Documentation/Makefile does not include bitmap-format.txt to generate
> a html page using asciidoc.
>
> Teach Documentation/Makefile to also generate a html page for
> Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhradeep Chakraborty <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  Documentation/Makefile | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

The change itself is obviously correct (assuming that it is worth
passing the document to AsciiDoc, instead of reading it in text,
that is).

> diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile
> index d3f043f50d2..8d405a14330 100644
> --- a/Documentation/Makefile
> +++ b/Documentation/Makefile
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ TECH_DOCS += MyFirstContribution
>  TECH_DOCS += MyFirstObjectWalk
>  TECH_DOCS += SubmittingPatches
>  TECH_DOCS += ToolsForGit
> +TECH_DOCS += technical/bitmap-format
>  TECH_DOCS += technical/bundle-format
>  TECH_DOCS += technical/hash-function-transition
>  TECH_DOCS += technical/http-protocol

Is bitmap-format the only one that is not fed to AsciiDoc, by the
way?  Are there other 'text-only' document that is worth converting
to AsciiDoc? 

It is outside the scope of this series, of course, to actually
adjusting them, but since you are already doing the homework, I
thought you might already know the answer, which may become a source
of inspriation for others to find something to work on.

Thanks.