public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "Kevin Cagle \(kcagle\) \[CONT - Type 2\]" <kcagle@micron•com>
Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git subtree issue in more recent versions
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:22:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa9b4kncm.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55893188F2F68B4B9819D7F9452F981D09FCDF67@NTXBOIMBX01.micron.com> (Kevin Cagle's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:50:01 +0000")

"Kevin Cagle (kcagle) [CONT - Type 2]" <kcagle@micron•com> writes:

> $ git subtree add -P oldGit https://github.com/git/git.git tags/v1.9.2
>
> Will produce this error:
>
> 10ff115f5c572299de4e04ade0d7adb3c75fbf1f is not a valid 'commit' object
>
> The bug isn't found in 1.7.1 (installed subtree manually) but is found in 1.9.0 and 2.0.0.rc1. 
>
> It's related to the git fetch putting the "wrong" SHA1 in .git/FETCH_HEAD.

The change 7a2b128d is very much deliberate; we wanted not to lose
information that the user was trying to pull a tag not a commit,
because not unwrapping a tag to a commit it points at too early is
essential to allow pulling and merging a signed tag, which was
released as part of the 1.7.9 that happened in late January 2012
(whew, is it already more than two years ago?  time flies).

    commit 7a2b128d13d880635e7317a9208cfa42a660f143
    Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>
    Date:   Wed Nov 2 19:19:34 2011 -0700

    fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD
    
    We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does
    "git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good
    enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD.
    The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses
    of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind.

If the caller of "fetch" (like the codepath in subtree) must see a
commit object, it needs to unwrap the tag itself in the new (eh, not
so new, though ;-) world order.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-29  0:50 git subtree issue in more recent versions Kevin Cagle (kcagle) [CONT - Type 2]
2014-04-29 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqa9b4kncm.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=kcagle@micron$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox