From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail•com>
Cc: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail•com>,
git@vger•kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix•de>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <johannes.schindelin@gmx•de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] range-diff: refactor check for commit range
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:59:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbldg7hvb.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ce0953a-92b2-2ce6-1e13-6f6240933ce1@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2021 19:12:54 +0000")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail•com> writes:
>> +static int is_range(const char *range)
>> +{
>> + return !!strstr(range, "..");
>> +}
>
> If the user wrongly passes two arguments referring to single commits
> with `:/<text>` or `@{/<text>}` where text contains ".." this will
> give a false positive.
True. I do not think this aims to be complete revision parser in
the first place, though.
It is tempting to at least idly speculate if an approach to run
setup_revisions() on argument is_range() takes and checking the
result would yield a more practical solution. I would imagine that
we would want to see in the resulting revs.pending has at least one
positive and one negative, and none of them have SYMMETRIC_LEFT set
in their .flags word.
Side note: Strictly speaking, people could wish "rev" to mean
"everything reachable from the rev, down to root", so
requiring one negative may technically be a wrong
thing, but in the context of "range-diff", I am not
sure how useful such a behaviour would be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 22:20 [PATCH 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] range-diff: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 19:12 ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-22 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-01-23 15:59 ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-26 15:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] range-diff: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-22 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 16:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-21 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-21 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 16:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 18:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 3:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-28 5:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 18:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-26 15:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 7:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-22 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25 7:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-25 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25 21:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-26 19:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-22 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-22 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 2:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-28 5:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-28 15:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
[not found] ` <xmqqim7gx41d.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
2021-02-06 0:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-01-22 18:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-01-27 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 19:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 21:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 22:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-04 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-04 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 1:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05 14:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-02-04 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Range diff with ranges lacking dotdot Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] range-diff/format-patch: refactor check for commit range Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] range-diff/format-patch: handle commit ranges other than A..B Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-02-05 14:44 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit ranges Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbldg7hvb.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox