Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-worktree: use working tree for trees on the file system

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:12:37 -0700

Stefan Beller <[email-masked]> writes:

> While it may be true that you can have bare worktrees; I would question
> why anyone wants to do this, as the only thing it provides is an
> additional HEAD (plus its reflog).

A more plausible situation is you start with a bare one as the
primary and used to make local clones to do your work in the world
before "git worktree".  It would be a natural extension to your
workflow to instead create worktrees of of that bare one as the
primary worktree with secondaries with working trees.