From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail•com>,
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] repack: accept larger window-memory and max-pack-size
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:37:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd2jiv92q.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123012656.GC17254@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:26:56 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:06:42PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> But I think there is a subtle problem. Here (and elsewhere) we use the
>> parsed value of "0" as a sentinel. I think that is OK for
>> --max-pack-size, where "0" is not a reasonable value. But git-repack(1)
>> says:
>>
>> --window-memory=0 makes memory usage unlimited, which is the default.
>>
>> What does:
>>
>> git config pack.windowMemory 256m
>> git repack --window-memory=0
>>
>> do? It should override the config, but I think it does not with your
>> patch (nor with the current code). Using a string would fix that (though
>> you could also fix it by using a different sentinel, like ULONG_MAX).
>
> Here is a series that does that (and fixes the other issue I found). It
> would probably be nice to test these things, but checking that they
> actually had an impact is tricky (how do you know that --window-memory
> did the right thing?).
>
> [1/3]: repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option
> [2/3]: repack: make parsed string options const-correct
> [3/3]: repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings
>
> -Peff
Sounds sensible; will chuck the hum-ulong series and replace with
these patches.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-23 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-21 22:48 git repack --max-pack-size broken in git-next Siddharth Agarwal
2014-01-21 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-21 23:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix "repack --window-memory=4g" regression in 1.8.4 Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] parse-options: refactor human-friendly-integer parser out of pack-objects Junio C Hamano
2014-01-22 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] repack: accept larger window-memory and max-pack-size Junio C Hamano
2014-01-23 1:06 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:26 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] repack: make parsed string options const-correct Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings Jeff King
2014-01-23 1:38 ` Jeff King
2014-01-23 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-01-22 22:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix "repack --window-memory=4g" regression in 1.8.4 Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqd2jiv92q.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
--cc=sid0@fb$(echo .)com \
--cc=stefanbeller@googlemail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox