Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] optimize string hashing in xdiff

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:40:21 -0700

Alexander Monakov <[email-masked]> writes:

>> Using xxhash() was merely a sample code path for technology
>> demonstration, so the Rust adoption topic may want to pick a
>> different code path to do its thing.
>
> My interest here is just speeding up xdiff in C, is that a welcome topic?

It seems that the (side) discussion on the performance has
concluded, and Ezekiel's new iteration of the Rust thing moved to a
non-overlapping part of the system, so I do not see any reason to
keep this topic out of 'next'.

Is everybody OK for me to mark the topic for 'next' soonish?  Any
objections I overlooked?

Thanks.