Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] bulk-checkin: implement `SOURCE_INCORE` mode for `bulk_checkin_source`

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:08:00 -0700

Patrick Steinhardt <[email-masked]> writes:

> I'm inclined to agree with your philosophy. Makes me wonder whether we
> should write a Coccinelle rule to catch this. But a quick-and-dirty grep
> in our codebase shows that such a rule would cause quite a lot of churn:
>
> $ git grep BUG\( | wc -l
> 677
> $ git grep assert\( | wc -l
> 549
>
> Probably not worth it.

Yeah, we can stick to our usual "do not add new instances, fix them
while touching near-by code" pattern for this one, I would say.

Thanks.