Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fetch.recurseSubmoduleParallelism config option

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:07:57 -0700

Stefan Beller <[email-masked]> writes:

> Assuming we go with your second school of thought (N are the real
> running processes, M including the finished but still pending output tasks),

That's neither of my two, I would think.

Anyway, I think it is now clear that it not very easy to say "I know
what to fill in M and N" there ;-).