From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail•com>
Cc: Tim Harper <timcharper@gmail•com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco•com>,
Jack Nagel <jacknagel@gmail•com>, Git List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Combining APPLE_COMMON_CRYPTO=1 and NO_OPENSSL=1 produces unexpected result
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:52:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfuxyisjp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160102234923.GA14424@gmail.com> (David Aguilar's message of "Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:49:23 -0800")
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail•com> writes:
> I think the best long-term solution would be to abandon the
> CommonCrypto backend, if possible. There's not a strong reason
> for its existence. It always seemed kinda hacky, and bolted-on.
> ...
>> A few questions we should be asking Apple users are:
>>
>> - Is there a strong-enough reason why those who do not want to use
>> SSL should be able to choose the SHA-1 implementation available
>> from CommonCrypto over block-sha1?
>
> IMO, no.
>
>> - Is CommonCrypto SHA-1 a better implementation than block-sha1?
>
> I do not believe this to be true.
>
> My gut feeling is that we cannot rely on the long-term stability
> and availability of Apple's APIs. Block-sha1 works fine on
> the current Apple hardware and I suspect that it (or openssl)
> will continue to work fine in the future.
> ...
>> If people do not care, we can leave things as they are. It would
>> seem mysterious to use block-sha1 when we are not using CommonCrypto
>> for SSL (i.e. NO_OPENSSL), and otherwise CommonCrypto SHA-1, and
>> would invite a puzzlement we saw in this thread, though.
>
> I'm curious to see what others think about dropping CommonCrypto.
> It seems like a good choice from a maintenance POV.
Judging by a week-long silence, it seems nobody seems to have much
to say on this issue. Let me summon the git_osx_installer
maintainer to hear from somebody who know a lot better than me about
things around OS X.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 15:10 Combining APPLE_COMMON_CRYPTO=1 and NO_OPENSSL=1 produces unexpected result Jack Nagel
2015-12-23 8:51 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-12-28 2:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-02 23:49 ` David Aguilar
2016-01-15 18:52 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-01-15 20:28 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfuxyisjp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=davvid@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=jacknagel@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco$(echo .)com \
--cc=timcharper@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox