Subject: Re: [PATCH] strbuf: stop out-of-boundary warnings from Coverity

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:25:58 -0700

Stefan Beller <[email-masked]> writes:

>> Just make strbuf_slopbuf[] large enough to keep Coverity happy. If it's
>> happy, we'll have cleaner defect list
>
> It's down 31 defects, roughly 10% of all things coverity detected as
> problematic.
> YAY!

I actually think this is too ugly to live.  If coverity is buggy and
unusable, why aren't we raising that issue to them?