Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] negotiator/default: avoid stack overflow

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 15:11:40 -0700

Han Xin <[email-masked]> writes:

> This series avoid stack overflow in negotiator/default.c and memory leak
> in negotiator/skipping.c.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Rewrite the commit link in the typical format.
> * Fix the incorrect check for the COMMON bit introduced in v2.

I see Derrick pointed out a logic error during the review of v2 and
this round corrects it.  Is everybody happy with this iteration and
considers it safe to merge it to 'next'?

Thanks.