From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx•de>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] fsck: check tag objects' headers
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:41:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqiol527co.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140829234327.GF24834@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:43:27 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:25:16PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx•de> writes:
>>
>> > We inspect commit objects pretty much in detail in git-fsck, but we just
>> > glanced over the tag objects. Let's be stricter.
>> >
>> > This work was sponsored by GitHub Inc.
>>
>> Is it only this commit, or all of these patches in the series?
>> Does GitHub want their name sprinkled over all changes they sponsor?
>
> GitHub does not really care either way. I think it is well-known that we
> sponsor some git development (i.e., pretty much everything I and Michael
> work on), and we do not need that fact sprinkled in the commit history.
>
> But we are also happy for that fact to be transparent if it changes
> people's opinions on whether the patch is a good idea (i.e., to know
> that Johannes has some motive beyond just "I think this is the right
> thing to do"; I hope he _also_ thinks it is the right thing to do or
> would not post the series, of course).
>
> Personally, I think the cover letter is a good place for such things.
Yeah, and I saw it explained in the cover. It looked somewhat out
of place to see it duplicated only for this patch in the 6 patch
series and I was wondering if there was something special about this
specific patch, hence my question.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-02 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 14:46 [PATCH 0/6] Improve tag checking in fsck and with transfer.fsckobjects Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] Refactor type_from_string() to avoid die()ing in case of errors Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 20:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-28 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] Accept object data in the fsck_object() function Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 20:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-29 23:10 ` Jeff King
2014-08-29 23:05 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] Make sure fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-29 23:27 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] fsck: check tag objects' headers Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-28 21:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-29 23:46 ` Jeff King
2014-08-31 22:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-03 22:29 ` Jeff King
2014-09-03 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-04 2:04 ` Jeff King
2014-08-29 23:43 ` Jeff King
2014-09-02 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-09-03 21:38 ` Jeff King
2014-08-28 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] Add regression tests for stricter tag fsck'ing Johannes Schindelin
2014-08-28 14:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] Make sure that index-pack --strict fails upon invalid tag objects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve tag checking in fsck and with transfer.fsckobjects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 13:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 21:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-10 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 14:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 " Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Refactor type_from_string() to avoid die()ing in case of errors Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Accept object data in the fsck_object() function Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] Make sure fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] fsck: check tag objects' headers Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Add regression tests for stricter tag fsck'ing Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Make sure that index-pack --strict checks tag objects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 21:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] hash-object --literally Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 21:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] hash-object: reduce file-scope statics Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] hash-object: pass 'write_object' as a flag Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] hash-object: add --literally option Junio C Hamano
2014-09-12 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Make sure that index-pack --strict checks tag objects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Improve tag checking in fsck and with transfer.fsckobjects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] Refactor type_from_string() to avoid die()ing in case of errors Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] Accept object data in the fsck_object() function Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Make sure fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] fsck: check tag objects' headers Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] Add regression tests for stricter tag fsck'ing Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 8:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] Make sure that index-pack --strict checks tag objects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-12 18:02 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Improve tag checking in fsck and with transfer.fsckobjects Junio C Hamano
2014-09-13 9:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
[not found] ` <cover.1410356761.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
2014-09-10 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Refactor type_from_string() to avoid die()ing in case of errors Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Accept object data in the fsck_object() function Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Make sure fsck_commit_buffer() does not run out of the buffer Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 11:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-10 20:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-09-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] fsck: check tag objects' headers Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Add regression tests for stricter tag fsck'ing Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 14:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Make sure that index-pack --strict fails upon invalid tag objects Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-10 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 14:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2014-09-11 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-09-11 17:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqiol527co.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox