From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg•org>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail•com>,
git <git@vger•kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>
Subject: Re: "./t0001-init.sh --valgrind" is broken
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:56:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk2lj3692.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8AE9VovwuviwOLxRDTAbTXCivRVhk8ia4mdUnMN-0Y4OA@mail.gmail.com> (Duy Nguyen's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:16:55 +0700")
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com> wrote:
>> But it's probably better that we inject valgrind command
>> from inside bin-wrappers script, the same way we inject gdb, I think.
>
> For the best of both worlds, we should recreate bin-wrappers in
> test-lib.sh (i.e. the valgrind way), not in Makefile.
>
> Somewhat
> unrelated, but because topdir is getting really crowded and
> bin-wrappers is used for the test suite only, it should be moved
> inside t/ (i'm going to move all test-* to t/ too, later).
Weren't there people who pointed their bin-wrappers/ with $PATH to
test/use freshly baked Git before they convince themselves that they
want to install it? Not building it from the top-level Makefile
and moving it to elsewhere would be two breakages for them.
I am not sure if that is a good idea.
Moving test-* sources out of the top-level is a good idea, and
placing test-* binaries somewhere other than the top-level is also a
good idea. Just like t/lib-*.sh are helpers for tests, these are
also test helpers that happen to be written in C and compiled, so I
don't have a strong objection to make t/ the new location for
them--a different location (e.g. a new "test-helpers/" directory) is
also something I can go with.
Thanks.
In any case, are these two messages objections to J6t's fix, or are
you fine with the fix for 2.8-rc1 and merely raising ideas to redo
it in a different (i.e. your) way after 2.8 final, or are you
planning to do a fix in a different way for 2.8-rc1?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-03 0:07 "./t0001-init.sh --valgrind" is broken Christian Couder
2016-03-03 1:04 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-03-03 2:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-03-03 6:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-03-03 12:09 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-03-03 12:16 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-03-03 15:56 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-03-03 18:05 ` Jeff King
2016-03-03 18:17 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk2lj3692.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg$(echo .)org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox