From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee•org>
Cc: "Andreas Krey" <a.krey@gmx•de>, "Git Mailing List" <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD.
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:35:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk3ir6wu3.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531DBE1FF66D4356AEE6AEE5C2FE9389@PhilipOakley> (Philip Oakley's message of "Sat, 7 Sep 2013 20:19:20 +0100")
"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee•org> writes:
> What I observed was that all the clones had the same HEAD problem,
> which I think comes from clone.c: guess_remote_head().
Yes. They share "having to guess" property because their data
source does not tell them.
> My quick look at clone.c suggested to me that there would be a lot of
> commonality between the bundle data stream and the transport streams
> (identical?), and it was just a case of adding into the bundle data
> the same HEAD symref indication that would solve the normal clone
> problem (including backward compatibility). Is that a reasonable
> assesssment?
You need to find a hole in the existing readers to stick the new
information in a way that do not break existing readers but allow
updated readers to extract that information. That is exactly what
we did when we added the protocol capability. I do not offhand
think an equivalent hole exists in the bundle file format.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-08 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 15:52 [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] upload-pack: send the HEAD information Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-06 19:29 ` Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-08 7:13 ` Jeff King
2013-09-08 7:22 ` Jeff King
2013-09-08 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Removing the guesswork of HEAD in "clone" Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] upload-pack.c: do not pass confusing cb_data to mark_our_ref() Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] upload-pack: send symbolic ref information as capability Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 4:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] upload-pack: send non-HEAD symbolic refs Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] connect.c: make parse_feature_value() static Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] connect: annotate refs with their symref information in get_remote_head() Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Junio C Hamano
2013-09-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] connect.c: save symref info from server capabilities Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-06 19:25 ` Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-06 15:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] clone: test the new HEAD detection logic Andreas Krey
2013-09-06 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD Philip Oakley
2013-09-06 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-06 23:19 ` Philip Oakley
2013-09-07 15:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-07 19:19 ` Philip Oakley
2013-09-08 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-09-08 21:00 ` Philip Oakley
2013-09-09 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-09 16:08 ` Andreas Krey
2013-09-09 22:20 ` Philip Oakley
2013-09-09 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk3ir6wu3.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=a.krey@gmx$(echo .)de \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=philipoakley@iee$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox