public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail•com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 3/3] branch: add copy branch feature implementation
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 09:10:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqlgp69ds9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALiud+=qoSSSg_p2MXZEaVTGMhFW_FtirDJ2-FnmNh+U0yf0Gw@mail.gmail.com> (Sahil Dua's message of "Mon, 5 Jun 2017 22:52:16 +0200")

Sahil Dua <sahildua2305@gmail•com> writes:

> I want suggestions about one logical point raised by Evar.
>
> Let's consider a case that I'm on branch maint and then I do 'git
> checkout master' followed by 'git branch -m feature', it will rename
> master branch to feature. Now if I do 'git checkout -' to go to the
> last branch, it will take me to maint since master branch doesn't
> exist in this case.
>
> Now, for this copy operation - if I'm on branch maint and then I do
> 'git checkout master' followed by 'git branch -c feature', it will
> copy master branch to feature. Now if I do 'git checkout -' to go to
> the last branch, it will again go to maint (according to the current
> implementation). What do you think it should do? Is this the desired
> behavior? Or should it go to master branch since that was the branch
> checked out before copying.
>
> Also, in case this needs to be changed, can someone please point me to
> how it's being handled so that I can change the behavior.

When somebody says "I want to rename my current branch to X", it is
clear that the person wants to end up being on a branch called X.

To me, "I want to copy my current branch to Y" sounds more like "I
want to create another Y that looks just like the current branch,
but I want stay on my current branch".

If you think copy makes @{-1} problematic, perhaps your copy is
doing more than it should (e.g. switching the current branch at the
same time, or something).



  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-06  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-28 22:56 [PATCH/RFC] branch: add tests for new copy branch feature Sahil Dua
2017-05-28 23:30 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-05-29 20:41   ` Sahil Dua
2017-05-29 20:50     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-05-29 22:23       ` Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 17:55       ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-06-13 18:01         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-13 18:08           ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-05-29  2:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-29 19:39   ` Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 1/6] " Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v2 3/6] config: abstract out create section from key logic Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v2 5/6] config: add copy config section logic Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v2 2/6] branch: add copy branch option Sahil Dua
2017-06-01  1:50     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-01 16:09       ` Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v2 4/6] config: modify function signature to include copy argument Sahil Dua
2017-05-31 23:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v2 6/6] branch: don't copy or rename config when same branch name Sahil Dua
2017-06-01 18:35   ` [PATCH/RFC v3 1/3] branch: add tests for new copy branch feature Sahil Dua
2017-06-01 18:35     ` [PATCH/RFC v3 2/3] config: abstract out create section from key logic Sahil Dua
2017-06-01 18:35     ` [PATCH/RFC v3 3/3] branch: add copy branch feature implementation Sahil Dua
2017-06-01 18:59       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-01 22:05         ` Sahil Dua
2017-06-05 20:40     ` [PATCH/RFC v4 1/3] branch: add tests for new copy branch feature Sahil Dua
2017-06-05 20:40       ` [PATCH/RFC v4 2/3] config: abstract out create section from key logic Sahil Dua
2017-06-05 20:40       ` [PATCH/RFC v4 3/3] branch: add copy branch feature implementation Sahil Dua
2017-06-05 20:52         ` Sahil Dua
2017-06-06  0:10           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-06-06  0:14             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-06  7:39             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-06 10:13               ` Sahil Dua
2017-06-06 12:03               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-13 16:17       ` [PATCH 1/3] config: create a function to format section headers Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 16:17         ` [PATCH 2/3] branch: add test for -m renaming multiple config sections Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 17:10           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-13 17:31             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-13 17:39               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-13 17:53                 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-18 21:17           ` [PATCH v2 " Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 16:17         ` [PATCH 3/3] branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m) Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 17:05           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-13 17:30             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-06-14  8:01               ` Sahil Dua
2017-06-18 21:19           ` [PATCH v2 " Sahil Dua
2017-06-13 17:06         ` [PATCH 1/3] config: create a function to format section headers Junio C Hamano
2017-06-13 17:09         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-06-18 21:16         ` [PATCH v2 " Sahil Dua
2017-06-19 12:08           ` Ramsay Jones
2017-06-19 14:51             ` Sahil Dua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqlgp69ds9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sahildua2305@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox