Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] userdiff: update Ada patterns

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:05:49 -0800

"George Spelvin" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Another point is that Ada doesn't actually include leading + or -
> signs in the syntax for "number", but rather makes them unary operators.
> This means that spaces are allowed, and whether you want to include them
> in the "number" pattern is a judgement call.

I tend to agree.  What do the patterns for other languages do?