Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] reftable: ensure tables in a stack use sequential update indices

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 09:22:57 -0700

Patrick Steinhardt <[email-masked]> writes:

>> Wouldn't 'monotonically increasing' suggest that
>> prev_table.max_update_index can be equal to cur_table.min_update_index?
>> I have locally changed it to 'ascending order' for similar reasons.
>
> I guess the correct phrase here is "strictly monotonically increasing".

Both of you are right and I was wrong.  Thanks for a clarification.