Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] ref-filter: add new "signature" atom

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:51:31 -0700

Nsengiyumva Wilberforce <[email-masked]> writes:

> Co-authored-by: Hariom Verma <[email-masked]>
> Co-authored-by: Jaydeep Das <[email-masked]>
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email-masked]>
> Mentored-by: Hariom Verma <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Nsengiyumva Wilberforce <[email-masked]>

https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/4410308954/jobs/7727652857#step:6:1898

  + git for-each-ref refs/heads/signed --format=%(signature)
  + test_cmp expected actual
  + test 2 -ne 2
  + eval diff -u "$@"
  + diff -u expected actual
  --- expected2023-03-13 23:08:51.495987174 +0000
  +++ actual2023-03-13 23:08:51.519986953 +0000
  @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
   gpg: Signature made Mon Mar 13 23:08:51 2023 UTC
   gpg:                using DSA key 13B6F51ECDDE430D
  -gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
   gpg: Good signature from "C O Mitter <[email-masked]>"
   
  error: last command exited with $?=1
  not ok 342 - test bare signature atom
  + git for-each-ref refs/heads/signed --format=%(signature)
  + test_cmp expected actual
  + test 2 -ne 2
  + eval diff -u "$@"
  + diff -u expected actual
  --- expected
  +++ actual
  @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
   gpg: Signature made Mon Mar 13 23:08:51 2023 UTC
   gpg:                using DSA key 13B6F51ECDDE430D
  -gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
   gpg: Good signature from "C O Mitter <[email-masked]>"
   
  error: last command exited with $?=1
  not ok 342 - test bare signature atom

Are there differences between versions of GPG that, for the purpose
of the testing, we do not care?