Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 23:50:49 +0000

Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hmph, this seems to make one test fail.
>
> t5801-remote-helpers.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 31 Failed: 4)
>   Failed tests:  14-16, 31
>     Non-zero exit status: 1
> Files=1, Tests=31,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr  0.00 sys + 1.40 cusr  1.62 csys =  3.06 CPU)
> Result: FAIL

False alarm.  This byitself, or merged to 'seen' with other random
topics, no longer seem to break these tests.