public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink•com>
Cc: Marat Radchenko <marat@slonopotamus•org>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pull is Evil (was: Re: A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:55:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqppjyhnom.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536106EA.5090204@xiplink.com> (Marc Branchaud's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:21:30 -0400")

Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink•com> writes:

> But I'm definitely biased because I think pull is pretty much broken:
>
> * New users are encouraged to use pull, but all too often the default
> fetch-then-merge behaviour doesn't match their expectations and they end up
> starting threads like this one on the mailing list.
>
> * If we change pull's default behaviour, we'll just be shifting the
> mismatched expectations onto the other half of the new users who would be
> happy with fetch-then-merge.
>
> * I'm not sure why new users are taught to use pull.  I suspect it's because
> it tries to hide the idea of local-vs-remote branches, and people writing git
> tutorials don't want to overwhelm new users with what seems to be an internal
> detail.  But these notions are really fundamental to using git effectively,
> and I think pull does everyone a disservice by trying to gloss them over.
>
> Anyway, rather than ranting on I'll just suggest that there's not enough
> commonality between the ways people use git to make it worthwhile trying to
> teach pull how to deal with a significant number of them.  I think the pull
> command should be deprecated and quietly retired as a failed experiment.

I almost agree with the first sentence in the last paragraph, and
your bulletted list above supports it.

I am not sure how the second sentence can follow as its consequence.

If the conclusion were "maybe adding a 'git update' to match the
expectation of those who build on top of the work of others (aka
CVS/SVN style) more  closely and teaching new users to use that
instead of 'git pull' may be a good way forward", I can sort of
understand (if I may not be able to immediately agree with, until I
can regurgitate the ramifications of such a change) it.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-30 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-28  6:29 A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment Marat Radchenko
2014-04-28 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 14:21   ` Pull is Evil (was: Re: A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment) Marc Branchaud
2014-04-30 14:55     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-04-30 19:45       ` Pull is Evil Marc Branchaud
2014-04-30 20:01         ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-04-30 20:01         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 21:48           ` Marc Branchaud
2014-05-02  7:40           ` Andreas Krey
2014-05-02  8:46             ` David Kastrup
2014-05-03  6:17               ` Andreas Krey
2014-05-03  6:55                 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-30 20:14         ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 22:06           ` Marc Branchaud
2014-04-30 22:25             ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01  9:46               ` brian m. carlson
2014-05-01 10:48                 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 15:16                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-05-01 19:16                     ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 19:48                       ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-01 20:07                         ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-01 23:25                           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02  0:02                             ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02  0:37                               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02  1:10                                 ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02  1:14                                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 14:54                                     ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02 18:55                                       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 19:07                                         ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02 19:10                                           ` David Kastrup
2014-05-02 19:13                                           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 19:46                                             ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02 20:34                                               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 21:13                                                 ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02 21:18                                                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 22:01                                                     ` pull.prompt or other way to slow/disable 'git pull' (was: Pull is Evil) W. Trevor King
2014-05-02 22:20                                                       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-03  0:05                                                         ` pull.prompt or other way to slow/disable 'git pull' W. Trevor King
2014-05-03  9:50                                                           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-04 18:51                                                             ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-04 20:54                                                               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 23:20                         ` Re: Pull is Evil Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 15:20                 ` Marc Branchaud
2014-05-01 17:56                   ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-01 18:04                     ` Marc Branchaud
2014-05-01 18:30                       ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-01 20:21                         ` Marc Branchaud
2014-05-01 23:28                           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02  7:16                           ` Andreas Krey
2014-05-02  8:14                             ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-02 19:29                           ` Junio C Hamano
2014-05-02 19:53                             ` Junio C Hamano
2014-05-01 23:45                       ` brian m. carlson
2014-05-01 23:39                         ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 19:22                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 19:43                     ` Marc Branchaud
2014-05-01 19:27                 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 21:06         ` Philip Oakley
2014-05-01 21:16           ` Philip Oakley
2014-05-01 23:34           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-01 23:59             ` W. Trevor King
2014-05-02  0:31               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 16:47     ` Pull is Evil (was: Re: A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment) Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 17:09       ` Pull is Evil Matthieu Moy
2014-04-30 18:31         ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 19:10           ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 19:32             ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 19:53               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 20:11                 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 16:12 ` A failing attempt to use Git in a centralized environment Stepan Kasal
2014-04-30 17:15 ` Geert Bosch
2014-05-04  8:58   ` John Szakmeister
2014-05-02 20:56 ` Max Kirillov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqppjyhnom.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=marat@slonopotamus$(echo .)org \
    --cc=marcnarc@xiplink$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox