Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] maintenance: separate parallelism safe and unsafe tasks

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:32:32 +0900

Calvin Wan <[email-masked]> writes:

> .... I think for now it makes sense to hold off
> on rerolling this series (at least in the form of auto
> backgrounding/foregrounding tasks) since the purported benefits
> currently aren't worth the churn. Thanks again for the comments on
> this series

So, we'll place this topic on hold, or even eject from the tree to
be revisited later?

Thanks.