From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google•com>,
git@vger•kernel.org, mhagger@alum•mit.edu, loic@dachary•org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] Fix bug in large transactions
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsif3tfcf.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20150121234659.GE11115@peff.net
Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:23:39PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> (reported as: git update-ref --stdin : too many open files, 2014-12-20)
>>
>> First a test case is introduced to demonstrate the failure,
>> the patches 2-6 are little refactoring and the last patch
>> fixes the bug and also marks the bugs as resolved in the
>> test suite.
>>
>> Unfortunately this applies on top of origin/next.
>
> Saying "applies on next" is not very useful to Junio. He is not going to
> branch a topic straight from "next", as merging it to master would pull
> in all of the topics cooking in "next" (not to mention a bunch of merge
> commits which are generally never part of "master").
>
> Instead, figure out which topic in next you actually _need_ to build on,
> and then it can be branched from there. And if there is no such topic,
> then you should not be building on next, of course. :) But I think you
> know that part already.
All very true.
I consider anything new that appears late in the cycle, especially
during deep in the pre-release freeze, less for me to apply but more
for others to eyeball the preview of a series the submitter plans to
work on once the next cycle starts, so basing on 'next' does not
hurt too much. For interested others,
git checkout origin/next^0
would be shorter to type than
git checkout "origin/next^{/^Merge branch 'sb/atomic-push'}^2"
so... ;-)
But what is more troublesome is that neither this or updated v2
applies to 'next'.
Let me try to wiggle it in first.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-21 23:23 [PATCHv1 0/6] Fix bug in large transactions Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] update-ref: Test handling large transactions properly Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:34 ` Jeff King
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] refs.c: remove lock_fd from struct ref_lock Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] refs.c: replace write_str_in_full by write_in_full Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:38 ` Jeff King
2015-01-21 23:44 ` Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:52 ` Jeff King
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] refs.c: Have a write_in_full_to_lock_file wrapping write_in_full Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:40 ` Jeff King
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] refs.c: write to a lock file only once Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:44 ` Jeff King
2015-01-21 23:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] refs.c: enable large transactions Stefan Beller
2015-01-21 23:47 ` [PATCHv1 0/6] Fix bug in " Jeff King
2015-01-22 8:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-01-22 17:52 ` Stefan Beller
2015-01-22 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-22 18:29 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqsif3tfcf.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=loic@dachary$(echo .)org \
--cc=mhagger@alum$(echo .)mit.edu \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
--cc=sbeller@google$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox