From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "darcy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, darcy <acednes@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:30:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtthzrraw.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1q58ejnw.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 07 Jun 2024 10:40:03 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:
> I wonder if this should be of timestamp_t type instead, as the check
> is done against *timestamp in parse_date_basic() where *timestamp is
> of type timestamp_t to match?
Also, as you can see at one of the GitHub CI jobs, e.g.,
https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/9455916669/job/26046731619#step:6:1915
you'd need to either exclude some "these are too large timestamps
for the system" tests from 32-bit systems or expect output on them
to be different from 64-bit systems.
As you are actively detecting the condition and giving an error
message "too large for _this_ system", I think it is a good idea
to actually do the latter, i.e. on 64-bit system make sure parsing
is done correctly, and on 32-bit system make sure you get that "too
large for this system" error.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 9:17 [PATCH] fix: prevent date underflow when using positive timezone offset darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 14:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-28 14:49 ` Phillip Wood
2024-05-28 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-02 23:06 ` [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with " darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-06-03 11:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-03 11:44 ` darcy
2024-06-03 14:13 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-04 8:48 ` darcy
2024-06-04 9:33 ` Jeff King
2024-06-05 6:52 ` darcy
2024-06-05 13:10 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-05 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-06 4:56 ` darcy
2024-06-07 0:17 ` [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with " darcy via GitGitGadget
2024-06-07 17:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-08 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-14 1:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-15 11:47 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-11 23:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-06-11 23:49 ` rsbecker
2024-06-11 23:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] t0006: simplify prerequisites Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-06-26 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset Junio C Hamano
2024-06-26 15:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Darcy's "date underflow fix" topic, final reroll Phillip Wood
2024-06-26 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-12 9:07 ` [PATCH v3] date: detect underflow/overflow when parsing dates with timezone offset Phillip Wood
2024-06-12 9:49 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-13 13:31 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-13 16:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-14 20:09 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-14 21:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-15 11:49 ` Karthik Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqtthzrraw.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=acednes@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox