Subject: Re: [PATCH] real_path: make real_path thread-safe

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:32:14 -0800

Torsten Bögershausen <[email-masked]> writes:

> But in any case it seems that e.g.
> //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1/DIR2/..
> must be converted into
> //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1
>
> and 
> \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1\DIR2\..
> must be converted into
> \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1

Additional questions that may be interesting are:

    //A/B/../C		is it //A/C?  is it an error?
    //A/B/../../C/D	is it //C/D?  is it an error?