Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/67] fsck: don't fsck alternates for connectivity-only check

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:04:49 -0700

Johannes Schindelin <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hi Peff,
>
> On 2015-09-15 17:24, Jeff King wrote:
>> Commit 02976bf (fsck: introduce `git fsck --connectivity-only`,
>> 2015-06-22) recently gave fsck an option to perform only a
>> subset of the checks, by skipping the fsck_object_dir()
>> call. However, it does so only for the local object
>> directory, and we still do expensive checks on any alternate
>> repos. We should skip them in this case, too.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email-masked]>
>
> ACK!

Thanks, both.

Peff, I am inclined to take at least 1 and 4 outside the context of
this series and queue them on their own topics.  I do not think
either is too urgent to be in 2.6, but on the other hand they look
both trivially correct (that is a famous last word that often comes
back and haunt us, though), so...