public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: "Øystein Walle" <oystwa@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] commit: inform pre-commit if --amend is used
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:58:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqtx1nub9e.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141125034424.GA19161@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:44:24 -0500")

Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:

>   1. It is a bit more obvious when debugging or dumping arguments (e.g.,
>      via GIT_TRACE), especially if new options are added after the
>      first.
>
>   2. It makes it easier for a script to work on old and new versions of
>      git. It sees either "amend" or "noamend" for the two obvious cases,
>      and if it sees no argument, then it knows that it does not know
>      either way (it is running on an old version of git).
>
>      Technically one can tell the difference in shell between an empty
>      string and a missing argument, but it is sufficiently subtle that I
>      think "noamend" is a better route.

If we ever add more info, would we want to keep piling on new
arguments, though?  Wouldn't it a viable option to use "amend" vs
not giving anything (not even an empty string), so that normal case
there won't be no parameter?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-25  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-24 11:21 [PATCH] commit: inform pre-commit if --amend is used Øystein Walle
2014-11-24 23:14 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-11-25  3:44 ` Jeff King
2014-11-25  4:58   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-11-25  5:03     ` Jeff King
2014-11-27 14:40       ` Mark Levedahl
2014-11-28  5:18         ` Jeff King
2014-11-28 15:49           ` Mark Levedahl
2014-12-01  0:56             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqtx1nub9e.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=oystwa@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox