Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailsplit.c: remove dead code

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:38:45 -0700

Matthieu Moy <[email-masked]> writes:

> Stefan Beller <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> +	if (is_bare && !allow_bare) {
>> +		unlink(name);
>> +		fprintf(stderr, "corrupt mailbox\n");
>> +		exit(1);
>> +	}
>
> Not directly related to your patch, but shouldn't this be using
>
> die(_("corrupt mailbox"));
>
> instead?

Doesn't the exit status of mailsplit matter to its existing
invokers?