Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] MyFirstObjectWalk: fix description for counting omitted objects

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:25:31 -0700

Dirk Gouders <[email-masked]> writes:

>> "this means that" could be rephrased in a way a bit more helpful and
>> to readers with clarity, perhaps:
>>
>> 	Note that our object walk will not perform any better than
>> 	an unfiltered walk with this function, because all reachable
>> 	objects need to be walked in order to ...
>
> Would it be OK to rearrange it even more?

Sure.  We are in the business of clarifying this document, so making
it easier to read is very much welcomed.