Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blame: report correct number of lines in progress when using ranges

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 11:16:11 -0700

Philip Oakley <[email-masked]> writes:

>> But I do not object to being more explicit.
>
> The core point though was that it can be misunderstood, thus avoiding
> the indirection, as you say, makes it more explicit for the reader.

Yup.  FWIW, I was saying that what the author wrote was not _wrong_
per-se.  I agree that being explicit here (instead of hiding behind
a pronoun) is an improvement.

Thanks.