From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google•com>
Cc: git <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Flags and config to sign pushes by default
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:34:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy4h9bqml.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD0k6qS9qA2vrrxF6SQJ-RsX01rryCuZ0zPn4k+OP__TOPR2gg@mail.gmail.com> (Dave Borowitz's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:00:52 -0400")
Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google•com> writes:
> Slight digression for a question that came up during reworking the
> series: would it be reasonable to rewrite option parsing in
> builtin/send-pack.c to use the options API?
Surely. The part of the system whose option parsing predates
parse-options may not have been converted to do so yet, but as long
as the result is correct, why not. After all APIs were invented to
be used.
> That way we can easily
> reuse the option callback from builtin/push.c. (It would have some
> side effects like making --no-* variants work where they did not
> before; I assume that's a good thing, but it's marginally inconsistent
> with some other plumbing commands like receive-pack.)
As long as people are not deliberately feeding --no-something and
relying on it to fail, we'd be ok ;-).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 19:00 [PATCH 0/7] Flags and config to sign pushes by default Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] Documentation/git-push.txt: Document when --signed may fail Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 23:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 18:11 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/7] Documentation/git-send-pack.txt: Flow long synopsis line Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 3/7] Documentation/git-send-pack.txt: Document --signed Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] gitremote-helpers.txt: Document pushcert option Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] transport: Remove git_transport_options.push_cert Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 23:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] Support signing pushes iff the server supports it Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 23:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-19 15:18 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] Add a config option push.gpgSign for default signed pushes Dave Borowitz
2015-08-17 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 18:22 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-17 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 19:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 19:49 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 11:47 ` [PATCH 0/7] Flags and config to sign pushes by default Chris Packham
2015-08-14 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-14 20:29 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 20:31 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-14 20:55 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-14 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 18:32 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-17 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 18:54 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-17 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-08-17 20:00 ` Dave Borowitz
2015-08-17 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy4h9bqml.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=dborowitz@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox