Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: regulator: max8998: voltages and GPIOs defined at platform data structure

From: [email-masked] (Liam Girdwood)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:09:49 +0100

On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 08:46 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:33:33 +0100
> Liam Girdwood <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:43 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > Hi Lukasz,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email-masked]>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email-masked]>
> > > Fine with me:
> > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <[email-masked]>
> > > 
> > 
> > Lukasz, this is not applying against the regulator next tree.
> > Can you redo and add Mark and Samuels Acks.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Liam
> 
> Hi Liam,
> 
> I've fetched the newest voltage-2.6/for-next and merge it with newest
> mfd-2.6/for next. After that all patches are applying and kernel is
> building without errors.
> 
> The problem with this patch series is that it "touches" two
> repositories: voltage-2.6 and mfd-2.6. 
> 
> I'm a bit confused how such situation should be resolved, since it
> involves two separate repositories (and two maintainers to cooperate).
> 

You should only base your patches on one tree for upstreaming and since
this series mostly touches regulator it's best base against the
regulator tree.

Liam
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk