Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users

From: [email-masked] (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:31:37 +1100

On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Thing is, the scheduler doesn't care about completion, all it needs is
> to be able to kick-start the thing atomically. So you really have to
> wait for it or can you do an interrupt driven state machine?

Or the scheduler callback could schedule a wq to do the job ?

Cheers,
Ben.