Subject: [PATCH v4 10/14] regulator: Add driver for Maxim 77802 PMIC regulators

From: [email-masked] (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:08:57 +0200

On ?ro, 2014-06-25 at 21:03 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The MAX77802 PMIC has 10 high-efficiency Buck and 32 Low-dropout
> (LDO) regulators. This patch adds support for all these regulators
> found on the MAX77802 PMIC and is based on a driver added by Simon
> Glass to the Chrome OS kernel 3.8 tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email-masked]>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v3:
>  - Set the supply_name for regulators to lookup their parent supply node.
>    Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Change Exyno5 for Exynos5420/Exynos5800 in regulator driver Kconfig.
>    Suggested by Doug Anderson.
> 
> Changes since v2:
>  - Use dev_warn() instead pr_warn(). Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Add a generic function to regmap core to copy registers instead of
>    having a driver-specific function. Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Remove unnecessary probe debug log. Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Set struct regulator_config dev field to MFD instead of the platform dev.
>    Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Read the regulators operational mode from the hardware registers instead
>    of setting to normal as default on probe. Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Remove unnecessary cross-subsystem dependencies. Suggested by Lee Jones.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - Remove unneeded check if num_regulators != MAX77802_MAX_REGULATORS.
>  - Fix .set_suspend_mode handler comment and split regulators ops for
>    regulators that behave differently. Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Use module_platform_driver() instead of having init/exit functions.
>    Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Use the new descriptor-based GPIO interface instead of the deprecated
>    integer based GPIO one. Suggested by Mark Brown.
>  - Look for "regulators" child node instead of "voltage-regulators" to be
>    consistent with other PMIC drivers. Suggested by Mark Brown.

(...)

> +
> +static struct regulator_desc regulators[] = {
> +	regulator_77802_desc_16_buck(1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(2),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(3),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_234_buck(4),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_buck5(5),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_16_buck(6),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(7),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(8),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(9),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_buck7_10(10),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(1, 10, 2),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(2, 10, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(3, 3, 2),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(4, 6, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(5, 3, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(6, 3, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(7, 3, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(8, 1, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(9, 5, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(10, 4, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(11, 4, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(12, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(13, 4, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(14, 4, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(15, 1, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(17, 2, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(18, 7, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(19, 5, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(20, 7, 2),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(21, 6, 2),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(23, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(24, 6, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(25, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(26, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(27, 2, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(28, 7, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(29, 7, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(30, 2, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(32, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(33, 6, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_p_ldo(34, 9, 1),
> +	regulator_77802_desc_n_ldo(35, 2, 1),
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int max77802_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +					struct max77802_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> +	struct max77802_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +	struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np;
> +	struct max77802_regulator_data *rdata;
> +	struct of_regulator_match rmatch;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node;
> +	regulators_np = of_get_child_by_name(pmic_np, "regulators");
> +	if (!regulators_np) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	pdata->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(regulators);
> +	rdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) *
> +			     pdata->num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rdata) {
> +		of_node_put(regulators_np);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_regulators; i++) {
> +		rmatch.name = regulators[i].name;
> +		rmatch.init_data = NULL;
> +		rmatch.of_node = NULL;
> +		if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, &rmatch,
> +				       1) != 1) {
> +			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No matching regulator for '%s'\n",
> +				 rmatch.name);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		rdata[i].initdata = rmatch.init_data;
> +		rdata[i].of_node = rmatch.of_node;
> +		rdata[i].id = regulators[i].id;
> +	}

I think instead of matching one by one you can alternatively match
everything at once:

static struct of_regulator_match regulator_matches[] = {
	{ .name = "LDO1", },
	....
};

if (of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, regulator_matches,
			ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_matches)) {

The code would be smaller although you would have to create an array
with names of regulators. I'll leave it up to you since I don't have
preference for it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof