Subject: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection

From: [email-masked] (Joe Perches)
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:28:50 -0800

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 21:07 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > * Which object code representations would you find representative
> > > ? for a further constructive discussion around this
> > > ? software component?
> > 
> > Evidence of actual object code improvement
> 
> How do you think about to provide a function implementation
> which looks a bit more efficient by default?

It's not a matter of "looks a bit more efficient".
it's taste, style, and repetition for various functions.

Some prefer that source code be "templatized" regardless
of the number of exit points that any particular use of a
specific function type.

Some of your patches are converting these templatized
functions to a different form for no added value.

These patches make the local source code inconsistent
and generally goes against the authors preferred style.