public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joe@perches•com (Joe Perches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:07:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452438425.7773.21.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452427000-4520-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 13:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
> 
> Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -5116,7 +5116,25 @@ sub process {
> ?			}
> ?		}
> ?# check for memory barriers without a comment.
> -		if ($line =~ /\b(mb|rmb|wmb|read_barrier_depends|smp_mb|smp_rmb|smp_wmb|smp_read_barrier_depends)\(/) {
> +
> +		my $barriers = qr{
> +			mb|
> +			rmb|
> +			wmb|
> +			read_barrier_depends
> +		}x;
> +		my $smp_barriers = qr{
> +			store_release|
> +			load_acquire|
> +			store_mb|
> +			($barriers)
> +		}x;

If I use a variable called $smp_barriers, I'd expect
it to actually be the smp_barriers, not to have to
prefix it with smp_ before using it.

		my $smp_barriers = qr{
			smp_store_release|
			smp_load_acquire|
			smp_store_mb|
			smp_read_barrier_depends
		}x;

or

		my $smp_barriers = qr{
			smp_(?:store_release|load_acquire|store_mb|read_barrier_depends)
		}x;

?
> +		my $all_barriers = qr{
> +			$barriers|
> +			smp_($smp_barriers)
> +		}x;

And this shouldn't have a capture group.

		my $all_barriers = qr{
			$barriers|
			$smp_barriers
		}x;		
> +
> +		if ($line =~ /\b($all_barriers)\s*\(/) {

This doesn't need the capture group either (?:all_barriers)

> ?			if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr))
> {
> ?				WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER",
> ?				?????"memory barrier without
> comment\n" . $herecurr);

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-10 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-10 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-10 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing " Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-10 15:07   ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-01-10 15:17     ` Joe Perches
2016-01-10 19:29       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-10 19:13     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-10 15:08   ` Joe Perches
2016-01-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452438425.7773.21.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox