public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pawel.moll@arm•com (Pawel Moll)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Fix cpu notifier priority
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:56:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457621806.22102.142.camel@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310143455.GA9998@hardcore>

On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 15:34 +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 08:40:45AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 13:14 +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > > Fix cpu priority of notifier block that was erroneously set to
> > > return value of next statement.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium•com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> > > index 7082c72..d4a939e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> > > @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_init(struct arm_ccn
> > > *ccn)
> > >  	 * picked to have a chance to migrate events before perf
> > > is
> > > notified.
> > >  	 */
> > >  	ccn->dt.cpu_nb.notifier_call = arm_ccn_pmu_cpu_notifier;
> > > -	ccn->dt.cpu_nb.priority = CPU_PRI_PERF + 1,
> > > +	ccn->dt.cpu_nb.priority = CPU_PRI_PERF + 1;
> > >  	err = register_cpu_notifier(&ccn->dt.cpu_nb);
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		goto error_cpu_notifier;
> > 
> > Damn, of course! I have never made (or heard about) such a typo
> > before 
> > - I wish the compiler warned about it :-(
> 
> actually my patch description is wrong. The compiler evaluates both
> statements but does _not_ overwrite the value of the first statement
> (would require parenthesis to do so).

I must admit I looked at the code change rather than at the
description, but thinking about it now, comma has the lowest
precedence, so the assignments will win. Still, with gcc 6 now warning
about suspicious indentations, my wish still stays a wish ;-)

>  So it is just a cosmetical change, feel free to drop it.

Oh no, it's still a bug (only maybe not a "stable-class" one). And one
I'll remember :-) 

Thanks!

Pawel

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 12:14 [PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Fix cpu notifier priority Jan Glauber
2016-03-09  8:40 ` Pawel Moll
2016-03-09 14:24   ` Jan Glauber
2016-03-10 14:34   ` Jan Glauber
2016-03-10 14:56     ` Pawel Moll [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1457621806.22102.142.camel@arm.com \
    --to=pawel.moll@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox