[PATCH] arm64: alternative:flush cache with unpatched code

From: rokhanna@nvidia•com (Rohit Khanna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: alternative:flush cache with unpatched code
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 21:43:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527889447350.37500@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527882765869.38555@nvidia.com>

1 more comment inline.

Thanks
Rohit
________________________________________
From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists•infradead.org> on behalf of Rohit Khanna <rokhanna@nvidia•com>
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 12:52 PM
To: Mark Rutland
Cc: Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com; catalin.marinas at arm.com; will.deacon at arm.com; Bo Yan; robin.murphy at arm.com; Alexander Van Brunt; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternative:flush cache with unpatched code

[RK] - Thanks for the comments Mark. Reply inlined.

Thanks
Rohit
________________________________________
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm•com>
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 2:03 AM
To: Rohit Khanna
Cc: catalin.marinas at arm.com; robin.murphy at arm.com; Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Alexander Van Brunt; Bo Yan; will.deacon at arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternative:flush cache with unpatched code

Hi,

As a general thing, could you please add a version number to patches in future?
i.e. this should be PATCHv4.

It really helps keeping track of patches, distinguishing versions, etc.

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 01:37:34PM -0700, Rohit Khanna wrote:
> In the current implementation,  __apply_alternatives patches
> flush_icache_range and then executes it without invalidating the icache.
> Thus, icache can contain some of the old instructions for
> flush_icache_range. This can cause unpredictable behavior as during
> execution we can get a mix of old and new instructions for
> flush_icache_range.
>
> This patch :
>
> 1. Adds a new function clean_dcache_range_nopatch for flushing kernel
> memory range. This function uses non hot-patched code and can be
> safely used to flush cache during code patching.
>
> 2. Modifies __apply_alternatives so that it uses
> clean_dcache_range_nopatch to flush the cache range after patching code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Khanna <rokhanna@nvidia•com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  3 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 6171178075dc..9d1aee7c9aba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -617,6 +617,9 @@
>  #define MVFR1_FPDNAN_SHIFT           4
>  #define MVFR1_FPFTZ_SHIFT            0
>
> +/* SYS_CTR_EL0 */
> +#define SYS_CTR_ISIZE_SHIFT          0
> +#define SYS_CTR_DSIZE_SHIFT          16

We already have CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT in <asm/cache.h>

Can we please add CTR_IMINLIN_SHIFT there too?

Maybe those should be moved into sysreg.h, but that can be a separate cleanup.

[RK] -  <asm/cache.h> doesnt contain CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT.
[RK ] - Sorry, I was looking at kernel-4.14 and couldnt find it there. I can find it in linux-next repo.

>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT    28
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_SHIFT   24
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> index 5c4bce4ac381..6b8c5438b37b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,41 @@ static void patch_alternative(struct alt_instr *alt,
>       }
>  }
>
> +/* This is used for flushing kernel memory range after
> + * __apply_alternatives has patched kernel code
> + */
> +static void clean_dcache_range_nopatch(void *start, void *end)
> +{
> +     u64 d_start, i_start, d_size, i_size, ctr_el0;

I don't think we need separate i_start and d_start variables. A 'start' or
'cur' variable could be used for both.
[RK] - ok.

> +
> +     /* use sanitised value of ctr_el0 rather than raw value from CPU */
> +     ctr_el0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0);
> +     /* size in bytes */
> +     d_size = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(ctr_el0,
> +                     SYS_CTR_DSIZE_SHIFT);
> +     i_size = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(ctr_el0,
> +                     SYS_CTR_ISIZE_SHIFT);

This isn't the size in bytes. Each is log2 the number of (4-byte) words.

i.e. the size in bytes is (xMinLine << 2).
[RK] - This doesnt seem right. For eg if IMinLine = 4 or 0b100
           then with above formula ICacheSize in Bytes = 4 << 2 = 16
           The correct formula should be (4 << xMinLine).
            So in case IMinLine = 4 or 0b100,
            ICacheSizeBytes = 4 << 4 = 64B

> +
> +     d_start = (u64)start & ~(d_size - 1);
> +     while (d_start <= (u64)end) {
> +             /* Use civac instead of cvau. This is required
> +              * due to ARM errata 826319, 827319, 824069,
> +              * 819472 on A53
> +              */
> +             asm volatile("dc civac, %0" : : "r" (d_start));

Either this needs a memory clobber, or we need barrier() first, to ensure that
the compiler doesn't re-order this against some of the patching code, however
unlikely that may be.
[RK] - So add barrier() before calling clean_dcache_range_nopatch() ?

> +             d_start += d_size;
> +     }

The loop can be simplified to:

        do {
                asm ( ... );
        } while (d_start += d_size, d_start < (u64)end)
[RK] - ok

> +     dsb(ish);
> +
> +     i_start = (u64)start & ~(i_size - 1);
> +     while (i_start <= (u64)end) {
> +             asm volatile("ic ivau, %0" : : "r" (i_start));
> +             i_start += i_size;
> +     }

Likewise here.
[RK] - ok

Thanks,
Mark.

> +     dsb(ish);
> +     isb();
> +}
> +
>  static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region, bool use_linear_alias)
>  {
>       struct alt_instr *alt;
> @@ -155,7 +190,7 @@ static void __apply_alternatives(void *alt_region, bool use_linear_alias)
>
>               alt_cb(alt, origptr, updptr, nr_inst);
>
> -             flush_icache_range((uintptr_t)origptr,
> +             clean_dcache_range_nopatch((uintptr_t)origptr,
>                                  (uintptr_t)(origptr + nr_inst));
>       }
>  }
> --
> 2.1.4
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel