Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, 11/32] drm/mediatek: split DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL setting into another use case

From: CK Hu <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:21:04 +0800

Hi, Yongqiang:

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 22:50 +0800, [email-masked] wrote:
> From: Yongqiang Niu <[email-masked]>
> 
> Here is two modifition in this patch:
> 1.bls->dpi0 and rdma1->dsi are differen usecase,
> Split DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL setting into anther usecase
> 2.remove DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL setting, DPI_SEL_IN_BLS is 0 and
> this is same with hardware defautl setting,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> index 4866a9b..c93e1b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> @@ -392,10 +392,9 @@ static void mtk_ddp_sout_sel(void __iomem *config_regs,
>  	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
>  		writel_relaxed(BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI,
>  			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL);
> +	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
>  		writel_relaxed(DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA,
>  			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL);
> -		writel_relaxed(DPI_SEL_IN_BLS,
> -			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL);

As internal discussion, please rewrite this to prevent breaking MT2701
connection. It's better to add comment to address the special usage for
MT2701.

Regards,
CK

>  	}
>  }

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel