Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_ext: support to record the last stack of page

From: Walter Wu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:43:58 +0800

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 12:31 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:07:49AM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 12:57 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 09.09.19 10:53, Walter Wu wrote:
> > > > KASAN will record last stack of page in order to help programmer
> > > > to see memory corruption caused by page.
> > > > 
> > > > What is difference between page_owner and our patch?
> > > > page_owner records alloc stack of page, but our patch is to record
> > > > last stack(it may be alloc or free stack of page).
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <[email-masked]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  mm/page_ext.c | 3 +++
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > index 5f5769c7db3b..7ca33dcd9ffa 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> > > > @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static struct page_ext_operations *page_ext_ops[] = {
> > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_IDLE_PAGE_TRACKING) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> > > >  	&page_idle_ops,
> > > >  #endif
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > > > +	&page_stack_ops,
> > > > +#endif
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  static unsigned long total_usage;
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Are you sure this patch compiles?
> > > 
> > This is patchsets, it need another patch2.
> > We have verified it by running KASAN UT on Qemu.
> 
> Any patchset must be bisectable: do not break anything in the middle of
> patchset.
> 

Thanks your reminder.
I should explain complete message at commit log.
Our patchsets is below:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/104
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/123

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel