Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add Mediatek MT8183

From: Nick Fan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:34:15 +0800

Sorry for my late reply.
I have checked internally.
The MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D is just a legacy name, not really 2D
domain.

If the naming too confusing, we can change this name to
MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_CORE2 for consistency.

Thanks

Nick Fan

On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 08:55 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:

> +Nick Fan +Sj Huang @ MTK
> 
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:16 AM Rob Herring <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:26:21PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > Define a compatible string for the Mali Bifrost GPU found in
> > > Mediatek's MT8183 SoCs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <[email-masked]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v4:
> > >  - Add power-domain-names description
> > >    (kept Alyssa's reviewed-by as the change is minor)
> > > v3:
> > >  - No change
> > >
> > >  .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml        | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > index 4ea6a8789699709..0d93b3981445977 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
> > >      items:
> > >        - enum:
> > >            - amlogic,meson-g12a-mali
> > > +          - mediatek,mt8183-mali
> > >            - realtek,rtd1619-mali
> > >            - rockchip,px30-mali
> > >        - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
> > > @@ -62,6 +63,30 @@ allOf:
> > >            minItems: 2
> > >        required:
> > >          - resets
> > > +  - if:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        compatible:
> > > +          contains:
> > > +            const: mediatek,mt8183-mali
> > > +    then:
> > > +      properties:
> > > +        sram-supply: true
> > > +        power-domains:
> > > +          description:
> > > +            List of phandle and PM domain specifier as documented in
> > > +            Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> > > +          minItems: 3
> > > +          maxItems: 3
> > > +        power-domain-names:
> > > +          items:
> > > +            - const: core0
> > > +            - const: core1
> > > +            - const: 2d
> >
> > AFAIK, there's no '2d' block in bifrost GPUs. A power domain for each
> > core group is correct though.
> 
> Good question... Hopefully Nick/SJ@MTK can comment, the non-upstream DTS has:
> gpu: mali@13040000 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-mali", "arm,mali-bifrost";
> power-domains = <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_CORE0>;
> ...
> }
> 
> gpu_core1: mali_gpu_core1 {
> compatible = "mediatek,gpu_core1";
> power-domains = <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_CORE1>;
> };
> 
> gpu_core2: mali_gpu_core2 {
> compatible = "mediatek,gpu_core2";
> power-domains = <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D>;
> };
> 
> So I picked core0/core1/2d as names, but looking at this, it's likely
> core2 is more appropriate (and MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D might just
> be a internal/legacy name, if there is no real 2d domain).
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel