public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel@caiaq•de (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Voipac PXA270
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:07:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100323140727.GZ30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100323132109.GD9581@radix50.net>

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:21:09PM +0100, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:10:52AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail•com> wrote:
> > > Yes, they are used in the PCMCIA driver. And I'd rather avoid having GPIO
> > > definitions scattered across multiple files.
> > 
> > Mmm... that's because PCMCIA driver is not abstracted well enough to
> > allow all platform specific stuffs back into board file. Once that's done,
> > these shared definitions could be avoided to live in a separate header
> > file.
> 
> What is the recommended method to abstract that? For example, I have two
> boards with different GPIO pins assigned to mean certain external
> signals. I also ended up with GPIO definitions in a header, which is
> used by the driver, and I'd like to clean this up.

Make up a struct to pass as platform_data. Fill it in your board code
and pass down a reference to the actual driver. The driver code should
then only use resources referenced by the platform data.

This is common practice, just have a look how most other driver do it.

Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-23 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10  1:47 [PATCH] Voipac PXA270 Marek Vasut
2010-03-10  6:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-03-10 11:37   ` Marek Vasut
2010-03-10 13:35     ` Daniel Mack
2010-03-10 15:20       ` Marek Vasut
2010-03-22  2:10         ` Eric Miao
2010-03-23 13:21           ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2010-03-23 14:07             ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2010-03-23 15:45               ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2010-03-22  2:21     ` Eric Miao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100323140727.GZ30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de \
    --to=daniel@caiaq$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox