Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:30:30 -0700

* Shilimkar, Santosh <[email-masked]> [100903 05:07]:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> > owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1:00 AM
> > To: Russell King - ARM Linux
> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> > Bryan Wu; Will Deacon
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-
> > omap
> > 
> > * Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]> [100902 09:16]:
> > > From c04a57fc3b41d886f56ccdc27cf9758de0c95202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]>
> > > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:33:23 +0300
> > > Subject: [PATCH 6/6] omap: Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-
> > omap
> > >
> > > Fix SMP on UP interrupt handling for multi-omap
> > 
> > Here's this one updated to use !smp_cpu() instead of smp_on_up().
> > Looks like the description and subject needed some refreshing too.
> > 
> As I commented on other patch we should just avoid doing anything
> When the CPU is not OMAP4. 

Looks like the only fix needed now is the localtimer fix. Posted
a patch that uses cpu_is_omap44xx() to test for that.

Tony