Subject: [PATCH 2/7] perf: New helper function for pmu name

From: [email-masked] (Robert Richter)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:50:26 +0200

On 06.10.10 09:30:41, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > So, I am also fine with implementing a generic perf_pmu_name() for sh
> > and then derive the oprofile cpu_type string from it in the oprofile
> > code.
> > 
> Again, this is unacceptable.

Paul,

maybe I misunderstood you, but isn't this you preferred solution? We
make perf_pmu_name() part of the generic i/f and then derive the
oprofile name from the pmu name provided by perf.

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center