Subject: [PATCH V3 1/1]MMC: add support of sdhci-pxa driver

From: [email-masked] (Chris Ball)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:52:49 +0100

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:32:46AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
> > Update with comments from Matt and Eric.
> > Test with sd and emmc.
> > 
> > >From e5dd554ed4d3488a83d9a4888d68d1d85482f747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Zhangfei Gao <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:51:28 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: add support of sdhci-pxa driver
> > 
> > 	Support Marvell PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD Host Controller
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h |   32 ++++
> >  drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig               |   12 ++
> >  drivers/mmc/host/Makefile              |    1 +
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c           |  259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c
> 
> I'll take the drivers/mmc/ hunks, but you should send the plat-pxa/
> patch through the ARM tree.

Oh.  If we do that then the driver won't compile until everything's
together, because it #includes <plat/sdhci.h>.  Haojian/Eric, what do
you prefer here?  Should I take the arch/arm/ hunk via the MMC tree?
(If so, please provide ACKs.)

Thanks,

-- 
Chris Ball   <[email-masked]>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child